Direct Donation


Thank you for your support!

Subscribe to The Indie Game Magazine

Order now!



Joomag

Magster

The Armed Traveler


Click above to purchase!
Discount Code for $2 off: SQWTN2013

Want to Advertise?

Please email me for pricing and terms!

Gun Blog Black List

“She was asking for it.”

Judge rules that 10-year-old girl was dressed provacatively, and thus deserved to be raped by 24-year-old window washer and his 34-year-old friend.

The window-washer is being released in a few weeks, and his friend (who took the girl home with him after she was already raped, sexually assaulting her further) was already released after 8 months in jail.

It makes me mad enough when it’s suggested that a woman over the age of 18 deserved to be raped. NO ONE DESERVES TO BE RAPED.

But saying a 10-year-old girl deserved what she got? That’s just sick.

The girl is a ward of the state (since the age of 4). She is likely troubled, yes, and she might have been wearing the clothing she was due to circumstance and example by the type of people she was surrounded by in her daily life. Children LEARN by example, folks. If someone they’re close to or someone they look up to acts a certain way, and the child views no negative consequences from acting that way, they’ll think it’s okay, even “cool”, to act that way.

Judge Hall said the case was exceptional because the “young woman” had been wearing a frilly bra and thong.

The court heard that the girl regularly wore make-up, strappy tops and jeans.

“It is quite clear she is a very disturbed child and a very needy child and she is a sexually precocious child. She liked to dress provocatively,” the judge said.

“Sexually precocious”? What does that even mean? Was she turning tricks in the park to supplement her nanny’s income? Did she regularly proposition men verbally?

As far as “hearing” that she regularly wore makeup and such, I wonder who their sources were. The rapists themselves, no doubt, or one of their friends.

And 10 years old is NOT a “young woman”. 13? Maybe. 16 is more accurate for that term. But 10? That’s a GIRL. Some might argue that the term “little girl” still applies.

If you look at the article, you see this disturbing piece of information, as well:

The same judge caused uproar earlier this year by setting free another paedophile and telling him to give his victim money “to buy a nice new bicycle”.

So not only did he completely disregard the victim as being a victim, he encouraged further fraternization between the rapist and the child.

It seems to me that this judge has a bit of a sympathy issue with pedophiles. I think someone should search his house for kiddie porn – I’m willing to bet that he’s got quite a collection.

I hope someone castrates Judge Hall in his sleep and leaves him to bleed out. While they’re at it, they should find the three men set free by this asshole and “take care of” them, too. There is absolutely no excuse for this.

5 comments to “She was asking for it.”

  • “It seems to me that this judge has a bit of a sympathy issue with pedophiles. I think someone should search his house for kiddie porn – I’m willing to bet that he’s got quite a collection.”

    I was wondering that myself; anyone with his attitude is a sick SOB and should not be wearing a judge’s robes.

  • Squeaky Wheel

    anyone with his attitude is a sick SOB and should not be wearing a judge’s robes.

    Totally agreed.

  • Wow… I think this needs to be sent on to the BACANation radio show: online weekly show some of my brothers put on. URL is http://www.bacanation.org

    Thanks for the heads-up on this!

  • JP

    I have a better idea for the judge… Lock him up with the rapists he let off easy. Leave them all naked together with a big vat of vasoline in the locked cell. Throw away the key.

  • Squeaky Wheel

    Strings: I saw your post earlier. I think the age of consent in Britain is 16, but I could be wrong. Either way…16 and 10 are not the same, in any way, shape, or form. I perused that site a bit…looks like a great operation you guys have going on there! :-)

    JP: They’d probably just talk about little kids and circle jerk. That’s not punishment for a perv. Instead of being housed with the rapists, he needs to be housed with the lifers over here in the States…they look at child abusers like a housewife looks at soap scum. That would solve the problem rather quickly.